Cellular Healing

In classical mythology, Prometheus was chained to a rock, where a vulture pecked out his liver every day. It would have been nothing short of a catastrophe, but, this being mythology, the organ grew back every night. In fact, liver tissue actually will regenerate, if less than half the organ is removed. (That's why transplants are possible from living donors.)
Now science wants to do for other parts of your tired, aching body what mythology did for Prometheus (minus the vulture). Need a new knee, bladder or esophagus? Why not grow one? "We all did it once, in the womb," says Alan Russell, director of the McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Pittsburgh.
Leading the charge are doctors like Stephen Badylak, director of the Center for Pre-Clinical Tissue Engineering at the McGowan Institute. Already his research techniques have been applied to more than 1.5 million patients needing new tissue to repair the rotator cuff or lower urinary tract. Now he's working with the Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine (AFIRM) on a program to re-grow fingers and limbs lost in battle. He spoke with NEWSWEEK's Anne Underwood. Excerpts:
NEWSWEEK: Your work sounds like science fiction.
Stephen Badylak: Starfish, salamanders and newts can regrow a lost limb. Human fetuses can also regenerate many structures during the early stages of fetal development. But that ability diminishes or disappears by the time we're born. The question is why, because the information is still there in our DNA. We want to resurrect fetal wound healing.
Tell me about your work with AFIRM.
Because of innovative explosive devices, soldiers are returning from Iraq and Afghanistan with lost fingers, lost hands, lost limbs. The only treatment options now involve prosthetic devices. For a 20-year-old, the rest of life is impacted in a negative way. The Defense Department is approaching this in a Manhattan Project mode. It's put $100 million on the table to address these horrific problems from a regenerative-medicine standpoint.
Will you really be able to regrow fingers and limbs?
In the foreseeable future, I doubt it. Fingers and limbs are very complex. They include nerves, bone, skin, muscle and blood vessels. They're also large. Limb formation in a fetus is on a scale of a few millimeters. In a human, you're talking 20 pounds of flesh and bones.
But you've been able to regrow large portions of muscle.
A soldier in Texas had been injured by an explosive device in Afghanistan and lost a large portion of muscle in the upper portion of his leg. This loss significantly compromised his strength and range of motion and his ability to engage in normal activities. We helped regenerate a portion of that muscle, which is amazing. That never happens spontaneously. Over the next year, we'll treat another eight to 10 soldiers.
How much of the muscle has grown back?
The results might be considered modest by some standards, but they're significantly better than anything tried before. He's had maybe a 12 percent increase in muscle mass, as measured by CT scan, and a 7 to 10 percent increase in strength over a two-month period. He wants a second procedure.
What made him a good candidate for this treatment?
The part of the muscle at the hip was intact, and the part at the knee was intact, so we were just replacing the section in between. Once you get the process started, the body takes over.

How do you initiate the process?
There are a number of approaches to regenerative medicine. But the one I've been working with involves harvesting the extracellular matrix (ECM) from a pig bladder or intestine and placing it at the wound site.
I doubt most people know what the extracellular matrix is.
If you take the bladder or small intestine and scrape away all the cells, what you're left with is structural tissue like collagen and functional molecules such as growth factors. There are literally hundreds of these proteins, all housed in the ECM. They instruct cells on how to behave—whether to multiply or migrate or differentiate into different types of cells. They tell cells at the site of a wound what to do. Equally important, they recruit cells to the wound site that wouldn't normally be there, such as stem cells. I wouldn't be smart enough to put them all together, but I can harvest what nature has done.
How does tissue from a pig's small intestine communicate to human muscle?
That's a great question. Certain things are so important to mammalian survival that they are conserved across species. The amino acid sequences are either identical or else so close to those in humans that they deliver the same message.
And because the ECM contains no cells, you can implant it in a person without causing an immune reaction?
Right.
Is that enough to stimulate growth?
Simply placing the ECM at the site might get cells interested. But if you don't recreate the micro-environment needed for tissue growth, it won't happen. That means you need the right pH, oxygen, moisture and nutrients. You also have to apply the correct mechanical forces. An Achilles tendon, for example, has to bear weight. Without those signals, it will turn into loose connective tissue.
I know you don't like to talk about this, but working with a powdered version of ECM, you helped three people regrow the tips of fingers that were accidentally severed.
The tips of fingers sometimes regrow anyway, especially in children, so we can't prove this was because of our work. You would need a clinical trial.
Obviously, you didn't start by regenerating large muscles. You began with smaller applications, such as rotator-cuff repair.
The rotator cuff is the tendon group around the shoulder that holds the arm in place and allows it to move in different directions. When it tears, there's nothing a traditional surgeon can use to repair it now. It's like trying to sew back wet Kleenex. But when we implant ECM, the body treats it as a scaffold on which it can build. The body's own cells invade. The scaffold is gone within 75 days, as the body replaces it with its own tissue. More than 1.5 million patients have been helped with our ECM product Restore—and those of two other companies. It's not true regeneration, because we're using a scaffold. But it might be just as effective.
Can you see this becoming standard practice one day?
There are lots of clever new approaches to regenerative medicine. We're learning which therapies work best for which applications. I believe we will get there.

Review

This has actually shown us the power of Science and Technology. Due to this vest advancement, we are now able to grow back lost muscles and who knows, in the future, we might just be able to regenerate our limbs and this is a great benefit to society.
Benefits enjoyed could be that the disabled would not be disabled anymore, casualties of war, people who loses their limbs for their country might be able to get them back, kids born with disability, has a chance to be normal when they grow up. It is helpful to the economy.

Let’s look at the point of the economy. With less disabled, it means that we do not need to specially cater to them, not saying that it is a nuisance but the resources used could have been put into better uses like pump into firms and R&D. There will be more working adults and more people to take the challenge of the working world. There will be more people working, boasting our economy.
It also reduce the number of depress patients due to disability; it reduces the suffering that this people have to endure. As they all have a chance to be able to be normal again.
Thus, it is seen that cellular healing has great future and prospect and brings great benefits.

However, there are some short term problems. For example, if everyone is normal, and the disabled no longer exist or one does not need to be disabled for long, how can we grow stronger? A famous saying goes”what doesn’t kills us, makes us stronger.” People who manage to survive their disability are actually excellent role models in terms of their determination and their will to live despite their disabilities.
These disabled people also teaches us moral values just by staying the way they are. We learn to be more caring and careful and responsible. Imagine, if the world is void of all these disabilities, there will not be ramps and handlebars. There would be people trying to invent the automatic wheelchair, lifts will not be placed in every story and every HDB flat.

Plus, this treatment is expensive and not liable to everyone, it will result in poor people having to stay disabled and the rich being normal. But I believe in the future things will change and everyone will get a chance.

Singapore will definitely benefit from this as people are our main source of income. It’s the people that is the generating the income for the country and they are therefore our most important resource. With more people becoming fit enough to work and at harder and more challenging jobs like engineering and biomedical, our chance of prospering and progress will be higher than it is now.

British fundraiser wins "best job in the world"

By Belinda Goldsmith
CANBERRA, May 6 - British charity fundraiser Ben Southall won the "best job in the world" on Wednesday -- caretaker of an Australia tropical island -- after an innovative marketing campaign that highlighted the power of social media.
Southall, 34, was picked from 16 final contestants in a highly publicised contest by Tourism Queensland which attracted 34,684 video entries from almost 200 countries and surpassed all expectations in promoting tourism in the Australian state.
The job description? Explore the islands of the Great Barrier Reef for six months and report back to Tourism Queensland and the world via blogs, a photo diary, video updates and interviews.
Also, if you feel like it, feed the fish, collect the mail and clean the pool -- and collect a wage of A$150,000
While the job itself attracted global attention so did the campaign by the government body Tourism Queensland as it highlighted how companies can tap the power of online social media such as YouTube and Facebook, for marketing.
"This is probably the first time that a campaign has achieved this sort of reach with so little advertising spend other than a few strategically place job ads around the world," said Australian marketing analyst Tim Burrowes, editor of media and marketing website Mumbrella.
"This has all been about the power of people passing things on, largely through YouTube. The main lesson to be learned here is that if you have an original, exciting idea that gets people talking you don't need to spend huge on advertising."
The "Best Job in the World" campaign began in January with Tourism Queensland launching a tourism advertising campaign centered around the lure of "the best job in the world."
Within days the campaign went viral as applicants from all over the world sent in 60-second video applications and news of the contest spread on social networking sites such as Facebook and the video sharing site YouTube.

Review
Firstly I would like to agree that the power of the social media is beyond our imagination. Within a short period of time, it does the help to publicise this search in finding the most suitable caretaker for the island throughout the world. Another good example would be the recent event of a woman singing in Britain’s got talent show. From someone whom no one have heard of has now rocketed to fame after a phenomenal performance.

The next point I would like to point out is the phrase ‘ The best job in the world’. I would like to know what exactly the definition of ‘best’ is in this case. Although the job do may sound attractive and easy, just because you get to enjoy and get money! However, feel that the word ‘best’ is a too extreme word to use. For someone who just loves to enjoy and explore and island, definitely it would be the best job to him/her but to someone who doesn’t like doing those stuff, may just feel that it is torture. Just like your best friend may not be another’s best friend.

Another point is that they claimed that ‘The main lesson to be learned here is that if you have an original, exciting idea that gets people talking you don't need to spend huge on advertising’. I felt that this project has reached to so many people , partly is also because of the salary they are giving, which is not a small sum. Thus, although they did not spend much on advertising, but they are spending the money on another component of the job, which is the salary. So I think that they should actually change their claim to ‘ The main lesson to be learned here is that if you have an original, exciting idea that gets people talking about and have a high pay for incentive, you don’t need to spend huge on advertising!